Graham Atkins Solicitor: BBC to pay 'substantial' damages to Ukraine president over false claim he authorised corrupt payment to meet Trump
Story which ran on News at Ten
and broadcaster's website 'seriously defamatory', High Court told
The BBC is to pay
considerable damages to Ukraine’s president over false allegations he
authorised a corrupt payment to arrange talks with Donald Trump.
Petro Poroshenko took legal
action after the broadcaster wrongly claimed Michael Cohen, the US
president’s former personal lawyer, received a $400,000 (£305,000) payment to
help secure "substantial talks" with the US president.
The story ran on the BBC’s
website and as a headline news item on the News At Ten on 23
May last year.
Mr Poroshenko has accepted an
apology and “a substantial sum by way of compensation” from the corporation,
which has agreed to pay his legal costs and publish a correction, the High
Court in London heard on Thursday.
The Ukrainian president’s
solicitor, Graham Atkins, told judge Julian Knowles the allegation
that Mr Poroshenko “procured or authorised a corrupt payment” was “seriously
defamatory”.
He added: “Put simply, this
allegation and the facts on which it purported to be based are simply false.
“Mr Poroshenko did not authorise
or procure any payment to Mr Cohen of any kind, nor was any such payment ever
made to Mr Cohen or any other individuals for that purpose.
“Mr Poroshenko did not instruct
close associates to open up any back channel with Mr Trump in order to secure
substantial talks with him, far less did he do so through Mr Cohen.”
Mr Atkins told the court Mr
Poroshenko “deeply regrets that it took the BBC so long to accept liability”
and to remove the article from its website, adding: “He believes that the
resulting delay will inevitably have increased the damage caused to his reputation
by the publication of this allegation.
“It has certainly added to the
distress and embarrassment that he has felt since the story was first
published.”
The lawyer added: “The allegation
that Mr Poroshenko was guilty of serious corruption is self-evidently an
extremely grave and damaging one ... especially so given the emphasis which he
has chosen to place during his presidency on the promotion of a number of
anti-corruption measures.”
He said the BBC’s reports were
“clearly likely to undermine the hard work undertaken by the president during
his time in office, and to cause him very considerable political embarrassment
not only in Ukraine, but in the United Kingdom and across the global stage”.
“In this connection it is
relevant that inevitably, given the serious and sensational nature of the
allegation (especially as it also related to the US president, Mr Trump), and
the prominence given to it by the BBC, the allegation was picked up and republished
in other media publications.”
Jane Phillips, counsel for the
BBC, said: “The BBC is happy to acknowledge that these claims about the
claimant are completely untrue, and it is here, through me, to apologise to the
claimant for any distress and embarrassment caused to him by the article and
the broadcast.”
The figure to be paid by the BBC
was not disclosed in court.
A BBC spokesman said in a
statement following the hearing: “In our News At Ten bulletin and in
an online article published on 23 May 2018 we incorrectly reported that Petro
Poroshenko, the president of the Ukraine, had procured or authorised a corrupt
payment of $400,000 to be made to Michael Cohen, the personal lawyer of Donald
Trump, to extend a brief meeting between Mr Poroshenko and President Trump,
that had already been agreed, into more substantial talks.
“We believed that the
publications made a less serious allegation against Mr Poroshenko, but in the
light of a finding by the High Court that the allegation was as set out above,
we are happy to accept that this allegation was untrue.
“We apologise to Mr Poroshenko
for any distress caused and have agreed to pay him damages, legal costs and
have participated in a joint statement in open court.” Read
more-------->>>>>>
Also Read our Given Below Articles
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/british-presenter-sues-arnie-7227994.html
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-aug-26-me-arnold26-story.html
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-aliens-have-landed-send-for-a-magistrate-0k3096crp2t
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/feb/22/cherie-blair-news-international
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-hacking-blair-idUKTRE81L1XY20120222
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna46484393
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17133210
https://www.smh.com.au/world/cherie-blair-sues-over-uk-phone-hacking-20120223-1toq5.html
https://www.thelawyer.com/boutique-scores-victory-for-blairs-over-paparazzi-2/
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/nov/23/privacy.dailymail
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/jul/09/daily-express-kate-beckinsale
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/kate-beckinsale-accepts-libel-payout-1740218.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-beckinsale-idUKTRE5682BF20090709
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/dec/11/josh-hartnett-wins-libel-damages-daily-mirror
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/dec/11/pressandpublishing
https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2001/12/13/side-show/
https://pressgazette.co.uk/archive-content/standard-runs-feature-in-100k-libel-deal/
https://www.theage.com.au/world/late-playwrights-partner-wins-damages-20040213-gdxas6.html
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/jun/20/daily-mail-libel-damages-tv-psychic
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/lawyer-in-the-news/psychics-libel-battle-ends-in-victory/71559.article
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/towies-scandalous-start-big-brother-22623243
http://news.bbc.co.uk/panorama/hi/front_page/newsid_9548000/9548226.stm
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/aug/10/cherie-blair-libel-news-of-the-world
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/apr/04/newsoftheworld.pressandpublishing
Comments
Post a Comment